i9-10900K vs i3-6100 - Counter-Strike: Global Offensive RX 5300M - Game Performance Benchmarks

RX 5300M with Intel Core i9-10900K

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

RX 5300M with Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz

i9-10900K i3-6100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts

5491 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts

2107 Pts

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive using RX 5300M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-6100

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	99.1 FPS
1080p	54.9 FPS
1440p	82.5 FPS
1440p	45.7 FPS
2160p	74.5 FPS
2160p	41.3 FPS
w1440p	84.0 FPS
w1440p	46.6 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	156.4 FPS
1080p	94.7 FPS
1440p	134.0 FPS
1440p	81.0 FPS
2160p	122.9 FPS
2160p	74.2 FPS
w1440p	136.0 FPS
w1440p	82.3 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	213.6 FPS
1080p	134.6 FPS
1440p	185.4 FPS
1440p	116.2 FPS
2160p	171.2 FPS
2160p	107.1 FPS
w1440p	188.0 FPS
w1440p	118.0 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	328.2 FPS
1080p	214.2 FPS
1440p	288.3 FPS
1440p	186.7 FPS
2160p	268.0 FPS
2160p	172.9 FPS
w1440p	292.1 FPS
w1440p	189.5 FPS

i9-10900K

The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

i3-6100

For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
The i3-6100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-6100 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Architecture

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
Codename	Comet Lake	Skylake
Generation	Core i9 (Comet Lake)	Core i3 (Skylake)
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	unknown	SR2HG
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	May 2020	Sep 2015

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Cache

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
Cache L1	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
Cache L2	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Cache L3	16MB (shared)	4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Cores

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
# of Cores	10	2
# of Threads	20	4
Integrated Graphics	UHD 630	Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs	1	1

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Features

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
	MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0	MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Notes

	i9-10900K	i3-6100

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Performance

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	37.0x	37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	No
TDP	125 W	51 W
Turbo Clock	up to 5.3 GHz	N/A
Voltage	variable	unknown

i9-10900K vs i3-6100 Physical

	i9-10900K	i3-6100
Die Size	unknown	150 mm²
Foundry	Intel	Intel
Package	FC-LGA1200
Process Size	14 nm	14 nm
Socket	Intel Socket 1200	Intel Socket 1151
Transistors	unknown	1400 million
tCaseMax	72°C	65°C