i9-10900K vs i5-13600K - Battlefield 1 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-13600K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
4308 Pts

Battlefield 1

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K in Battlefield 1 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-13600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.5 FPS
1080p
82.6 FPS
1440p
57.2 FPS
1440p
58.7 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
w1440p
47.1 FPS
w1440p
48.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.1 FPS
1080p
134.1 FPS
1440p
98.1 FPS
1440p
100.3 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
w1440p
83.1 FPS
w1440p
84.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
176.6 FPS
1080p
185.6 FPS
1440p
139.0 FPS
1440p
141.9 FPS
2160p
84.4 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
w1440p
119.1 FPS
w1440p
121.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
275.7 FPS
1080p
288.6 FPS
1440p
220.9 FPS
1440p
225.1 FPS
2160p
138.0 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
w1440p
191.0 FPS
w1440p
194.7 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-13600K specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Architecture

i9-10900K i5-13600K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBD
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Cache

i9-10900K i5-13600K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)24MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Cores

i9-10900K i5-13600K
# of Cores1014
# of Threads2020
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Features

i9-10900K i5-13600K

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Notes

i9-10900K i5-13600K

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Performance

i9-10900K i5-13600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 5.1 GHz

i9-10900K vs i5-13600K Physical

i9-10900K i5-13600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-13600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments