i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF - Battlefield 1 Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i5-9600KF

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
13507 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2735 Pts

Battlefield 1

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF in Battlefield 1 using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i5-9600KF

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.5 FPS
1080p
96.5 FPS
1440p
68.4 FPS
1440p
69.1 FPS
2160p
37.0 FPS
2160p
37.3 FPS
w1440p
56.4 FPS
w1440p
57.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
151.6 FPS
1080p
152.9 FPS
1440p
114.3 FPS
1440p
115.3 FPS
2160p
67.5 FPS
2160p
68.0 FPS
w1440p
96.9 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
207.6 FPS
1080p
209.3 FPS
1440p
160.1 FPS
1440p
161.4 FPS
2160p
98.0 FPS
2160p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
137.5 FPS
w1440p
138.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
319.8 FPS
1080p
322.1 FPS
1440p
251.9 FPS
1440p
253.7 FPS
2160p
159.0 FPS
2160p
160.0 FPS
w1440p
218.6 FPS
w1440p
220.3 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-9600KF
  • The i5-9600KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9600KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF specifications

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Architecture

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62BX80684I59600KFBXC80684I5960KFSRFAD
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Cache

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Cores

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
# of Cores46
# of Threads86
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Performance

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.6 GHz

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Physical

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments