i3-10100 vs i5-10400 - Ashes of the Singularity R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2609 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in Ashes of the Singularity using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
55.2 FPS
1080p
58.7 FPS
1440p
49.0 FPS
1440p
50.2 FPS
2160p
38.0 FPS
2160p
39.0 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
w1440p
47.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.2 FPS
1080p
100.3 FPS
1440p
85.9 FPS
1440p
87.7 FPS
2160p
69.1 FPS
2160p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
82.2 FPS
w1440p
84.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.2 FPS
1080p
141.9 FPS
1440p
122.9 FPS
1440p
125.3 FPS
2160p
100.1 FPS
2160p
102.3 FPS
w1440p
117.8 FPS
w1440p
120.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
215.1 FPS
1080p
225.1 FPS
1440p
196.8 FPS
1440p
200.4 FPS
2160p
162.3 FPS
2160p
165.5 FPS
w1440p
189.2 FPS
w1440p
192.8 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-10400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-10400

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 General

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Performance

i3-10100 i5-10400
Frequency3.60 GHz2.9 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-10400

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments