i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

23993 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3253 Pts
1397 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.1 FPS
1080p
32.4 FPS
1440p
49.5 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
38.9 FPS
2160p
21.8 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
26.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.9 FPS
1080p
60.2 FPS
1440p
86.7 FPS
1440p
52.5 FPS
2160p
70.5 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
w1440p
83.4 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.7 FPS
1080p
88.0 FPS
1440p
123.9 FPS
1440p
77.4 FPS
2160p
102.0 FPS
2160p
63.5 FPS
w1440p
119.5 FPS
w1440p
74.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
226.3 FPS
1080p
143.5 FPS
1440p
198.3 FPS
1440p
127.0 FPS
2160p
165.2 FPS
2160p
105.2 FPS
w1440p
191.6 FPS
w1440p
122.7 FPS
i9-11900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-11900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-11900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments
      D
      D 3 years ago
      Where 11900?
      0 0