i9-10900K vs i3-4350 - Anthem RX 5300M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-4350

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
4963 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2094 Pts

Anthem

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 in Anthem using RX 5300M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-4350

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
22.5 FPS
1080p
12.2 FPS
1440p
17.7 FPS
1440p
9.6 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
2160p
5.3 FPS
w1440p
14.7 FPS
w1440p
7.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
43.8 FPS
1080p
25.6 FPS
1440p
35.6 FPS
1440p
20.8 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
2160p
12.2 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
w1440p
17.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
65.2 FPS
1080p
39.1 FPS
1440p
53.4 FPS
1440p
31.9 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
45.7 FPS
w1440p
27.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
107.9 FPS
1080p
66.0 FPS
1440p
89.1 FPS
1440p
54.2 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
33.1 FPS
w1440p
76.7 FPS
w1440p
46.1 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4350
  • The i3-4350 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4350 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-4350
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveunknown
ReleasedMay 2020May 2014

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Cache

i9-10900K i3-4350
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Cores

i9-10900K i3-4350
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Features

i9-10900K i3-4350
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Notes

i9-10900K i3-4350

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Performance

i9-10900K i3-4350
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i3-4350 Physical

i9-10900K i3-4350
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4350 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments