i3-9320 vs i3-12300 - Anthem Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
3550 Pts

Anthem

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 in Anthem using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.2 FPS
1080p
44.2 FPS
1440p
32.4 FPS
1440p
34.8 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
19.3 FPS
w1440p
27.0 FPS
w1440p
29.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
74.0 FPS
1080p
78.7 FPS
1440p
60.2 FPS
1440p
64.0 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
2160p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
w1440p
54.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
106.9 FPS
1080p
113.1 FPS
1440p
88.0 FPS
1440p
93.2 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
75.8 FPS
w1440p
80.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
172.6 FPS
1080p
182.1 FPS
1440p
143.5 FPS
1440p
151.7 FPS
2160p
90.3 FPS
2160p
95.5 FPS
w1440p
124.5 FPS
w1440p
131.7 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12300 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-12300
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 Cache

i3-9320 i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 Cores

i3-9320 i3-12300
# of Cores44
# of Threads48
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 Performance

i3-9320 i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-9320 vs i3-12300 Physical

i3-9320 i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments