i3-4350 vs i5-9400 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 游戏性能基准


i3-4350 i5-9400

Multi-Thread Performance

4963 Pts
11750 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2094 Pts
2377 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-4350 VS i5-9400 在 Need For Speed: Payback 使用 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q -在与1080P,1440P,4K分辨率超,高,中,低质量设置CPU性能比较

i3-4350 i5-9400

超级品质
解析度 每秒帧数
1080p
31.5 FPS
1080p
54.5 FPS
1440p
22.7 FPS
1440p
39.3 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
2160p
26.9 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
35.4 FPS
高质量
解析度 每秒帧数
1080p
58.7 FPS
1080p
94.1 FPS
1440p
44.2 FPS
1440p
71.1 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
51.2 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
w1440p
65.0 FPS
中等质量
解析度 每秒帧数
1080p
86.0 FPS
1080p
133.8 FPS
1440p
65.7 FPS
1440p
102.9 FPS
2160p
47.8 FPS
2160p
75.5 FPS
w1440p
60.1 FPS
w1440p
94.5 FPS
低质量
解析度 每秒帧数
1080p
140.4 FPS
1080p
213.1 FPS
1440p
108.6 FPS
1440p
166.5 FPS
2160p
80.1 FPS
2160p
124.2 FPS
w1440p
99.8 FPS
w1440p
153.7 FPS
i3-4350
  • i3-4350 具有更高级别2缓存。可以从快速L2加载必须处理的数据/指令,并且CPU不必等待非常慢的DDR RAM
  • i3-4350 具有更高级别3的缓存。当您拥有大量的多处理工作负载,许多计算密集的同步进程时,这非常有用。更有可能在服务器上,在个人使用的计算机上更少用于交互式桌面工作负载。
  • i3-4350 有更多核心。拥有更多内核的好处是系统可以处理更多线程。每个核心都可以处理单独的数据流。此体系结构极大地提高了运行并发应用程序的系统的性能。
  • i3-4350 有更多线程。较大的程序分为线程(小部分),以便处理器可以同时执行它们以加快执行速度。
  • 对于某些游戏,具有更高时钟速度的CPU或技术名称IPC(每个时钟的指令)比具有更高核心数和更低核心速度的其他CPU具有更好的结果。
i5-9400
  • i5-9400 功率效率更高,产生的热量更少。
  • i5-9400 的进程大小较小。晶体管可以越快地打开和关闭,它就能越快地工作。以更少的能量打开和关闭的晶体管更有效,降低了处理器所需的工作功率或“动态功耗”。

Compare i3-4350 vs i5-9400 specifications

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Architecture

i3-4350 i5-9400
CodenameHaswellCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Haswell)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4
Part#unknownSR3X5
Production StatusunknownActive
ReleasedMay 2014Oct 2018

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Cache

i3-4350 i5-9400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Cores

i3-4350 i5-9400
# of Cores26
# of Threads46
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4600UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Features

i3-4350 i5-9400

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Performance

i3-4350 i5-9400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier36.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP54 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.1 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-4350 vs i5-9400 Physical

i3-4350 i5-9400
Die Size177 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA12CFC-LGA1151
Process Size22 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1150Intel Socket 1151
Transistors1400 millionunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-4350 vs i5-9400 in more games


讨论和评论

分享您的评论
R
radiationhig 11 years ago
i3 4350 or i5 4570?a i3 4350 with a asus gtx 750ti ddr5 2gb.or a i5 4570 with a sapphire radeon r7 250 2gb or this:http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-GeForce-GT630-Nvidia-Graphics/dp/B00896KEXU/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1413837108&sr=8-5&keywords=msi+graphics+card
0 0
S
silverhelpless 11 years ago
Definitely the i3-4350 paired with the GTX 750 Ti. The i3 is more than capable enough of a CPU for gaming, and you will get far better gaming performance out of a 750 Ti than a R7 250. Hope that helps
0 0
S
schoolsunkindness 11 years ago
i3 4350 or overclocked g3258 up to 4.6ghz?i will pair it with a 750ti and am mainly playing minecraft.
0 0
P
preplanupswing 11 years ago
go with the 4th gen i3 .. its better than the pentium g3258
0 0
A
awedcuddly 11 years ago
amd 8320 or i3 4150 or i3 4350? all with 750ti
0 1
U
uncheckedseasoned 11 years ago
The i3-4350 is the best out of all three, but you could go with the 4150 to save a bit of money.Depends on what you're going to be doing, of course.
0 0
I
irritatedefeat 10 years ago
fx 4350 vs i3 4150which one i need to go, i heard that the dx12 will increase the performance of the quad core processors is that right?gpu:gtx960
0 0
F
fakesquiggle 10 years ago
however, the fx-4350 has more headroom for overclocking, and may be better if you decide to overclock it, just be sure and give it proper cooling (water cooled) but thats all up to whoever is using it. dont let them fool you, this thing has .5 higher rating than the intel pentium g645, and actually the Intel I3-4150 amd the AMD FX4350 are about the same rating, however, the intel has a built in GPU, so it isnt necessary to go buy a graphics card, but with how fast those get updated, its not that big of a deal Intel G645 vs AMD FX4350 (what Elemential posted)http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Pentium-G645-vs-AMD-FX-4350#specsIntel I3-4150 vs AMD FX4350http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i3-4150-vs-AMD-FX-4350
0 0
Y
yoisydiesel 11 years ago
low budget cpu: i3-4150 vs fx-6300 vs fx-4350Hello,As the title says, I am trying to upgrade my CPU (and mobo, obviously).I am stuck between I3-4150, FX-6300 and FX-4350.I know that i3-4150 has much better, albeit fewer cores, but I was wondering if that is matched by the FX's more cores.This PC's most CPU intensive games will be Total war games, the occasional Skyrim and Fallout, and Paradox Interactive games.Post note:How Important is mobo chipset? I am thinking of an msi-h81 for the I3.
0 0
S
shirleyglazing 11 years ago
Yea I am such a fanboy, that I own two FX 8320 rigs. I couldn't turn down the $100 Microcenter deal for black friday. Lay off the AMD fanboy kool aid. $200 more, please... To get an overclock to even remotely touch a Xeon 1231v3, you would have to have exceptional cooling and a higher end motherboard. I could pair the Xeon with any board I want and they will all perform the same. Overclocking costs more, and AMD needs to be overclocked to compete, which makes their value pretty poor. PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchantCPU: AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz 8-Core Processor ($159.99 @ Amazon) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D14 65.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($71.74 @ OutletPC) Motherboard: ASRock 990FX Extreme9 ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($169.99 @ Amazon) Total: $401.72Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availablePCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchantMotherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme3 ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($119.99 @ Newegg) Other: Xeon 1231v3 ($252.99)Total: $372.98Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableBTW, I worked hard for all I have. I am far from rich. I buy lots of stuff used, on clearance, or on special on sale deals.
0 0