GTX 650 Ti Boost benchmark with FX-8120 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at High Quality

With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. This combination between GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core has less than 15% bottleneck in many games and can cause minor FPS loss. With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

GTX 650 Ti Boost benchmark with FX-8120 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at High Quality
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Price $ 169.0
Year 2013
Maximum Recorded Temperature 77C
Max Fan Noise 47.4dB
Recommended Power Supply 484W
Benchmark CPU AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core ($99.99)
CPU Impact on FPS -6.8 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -20.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings High Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 44.2 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 28.4 FPS
(Ultrawide) Average 1440p Performance 25.1 FPS
Average 4K Performance 18.6 FPS
Memory 2 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 7.4
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 12.3
(Ultrawide) 1440p Cost Per Frame $ 14.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 19.9
Series GTX 650 Ti Boost
Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Overall Combination Score 57/100 Acceptable

The GTX 660 might be the entry-level flagship of the latest Kepler set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 169. NVIDIA ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 650 Ti Boost, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

Spec for spec, this GTX 650 Ti Boost leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 550 Ti, by boasting 51.3 % more fps. The GTX 650 Ti Boost has 2 GB RAM compared to the GTX 550 Ti 's 1 GB video memory.

In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 650 Ti Boost blows past the GTX 550 Ti and, amazingly, even the GTX 560 as well. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 650 Ti Boost consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 550 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade.

Compared to its AMD 's closest rival, HD 7850, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was -13.5 % slower.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

High Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
39.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
36.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
34.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
34.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
31.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
30.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
29.7 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
29.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
28.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
26.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
26.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
26.2 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
18.2 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
23.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
23.2 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
22.6 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
20.8 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
19.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
19.4 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
17.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
14.1 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
13.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
13.3 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.8% and faster than HD 6950 by 4%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. Against its rival - the HD 7850, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is much slower. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin. Compared to its higher sibling, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was much slower than the GTX 660 by more than 20%.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

High Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
39.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
36.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
34.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
34.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
31.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
30.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
29.7 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
29.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
28.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
26.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
26.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
26.2 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
18.2 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
23.2 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
23.2 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
22.6 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
20.8 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
19.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
19.4 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
17.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
14.1 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
13.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
13.3 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.8% and faster than HD 6950 by 4%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. Against its rival - the HD 7850, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is much slower. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin. Compared to its higher sibling, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was much slower than the GTX 660 by more than 20%.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

High Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
91.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
85.5 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
82.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
82.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
81.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
80.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
73.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
71.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
69.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
69.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
67.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
62.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
62.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
61.6 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
57.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
43.2 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
54.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
54.7 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
53.5 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
49.2 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
46.7 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
45.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
45.9 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
41.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
33.4 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
33.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
31.6 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.6% and faster than HD 6950 by 4.2%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. Against its rival - the HD 7850, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is much slower. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin. Compared to its higher sibling, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was much slower than the GTX 660 by more than 20%.

Game Performance at High Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
22
31.6
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
16
22.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
14
20.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
11
15.7
2023 Forspoken
13
18.0
2023 The Callisto Protocol
10
14.5
2023 Dead Space
16
22.6
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
18
26.2
2023 Armored Core VI
18
26.2
2023 Immortals of Aveum
9
13.1
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
17
24.0
2023 Remnant II
10
14.5
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
13
18.6
2023 Atomic Heart
13
18.6
2023 Starfield
7
9.9
2022 Elden Ring
16
22.8
2022 God of War
15
21.7
2022 Overwatch 2
27
37.7
2022 F1 22
19
26.6
2022 Dying Light 2
18
25.3
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
18
25.3
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
28
39.2
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
21
29.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
15
22.1
2021 Halo Infinite
12
17.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
21
29.8
2021 Hitman 3
23
32.9
2021 Far Cry 6
22
30.9
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
24
33.4
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
24
33.8
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
13
18.2
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
9
12.4
2020 Valorant
48
66.5
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
21
29.5
2020 Death Stranding
24
33.3
2020 Marvel's Avengers
16
22.8
2020 Godfall
23
32.5
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
13
18.2
2019 Apex Legends
28
38.9
2019 Anthem
19
26.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
26
37.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
31
43.5
2019 Metro Exodus
15
21.3
2019 World War Z
26
36.6
2019 Gears of War 5
21
29.8
2019 F1 2019
26
36.4
2019 GreedFall
24
33.3
2019 Borderlands 3
17
24.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
31
43.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
13
18.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
20
27.8
2018 Just Cause 4
21
29.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
22
31.5
2018 Strange Brigade
32
45.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
28
39.4
2017 For Honor
36
50.6
2017 Project CARS 2
27
37.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
32
44.4
2016 Dishonored 2
20
28.4
2015 Rocket League
91
126.8
2015 Need For Speed
30
42.0
2015 Project CARS
29
40.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
49
68.3
2013 Bioshock Infinite
48
67.0
2013 Company of Heroes 2
22
31.5
2013 Crysis 3
40
56.5
2013 GRID 2
45
63.4
2013 Metro: Last Light
31
43.8
2013 Total War: Rome 2
28
39.0
2013 Battlefield 4
46
63.7
2012 DiRT: Showdown
38
52.9
2012 Far Cry 3
38
53.0
2012 Hitman: Absolution
48
66.5
2012 Sleeping Dogs
47
65.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
66
91.9
2011 Total War: Shogun 2
34
47.4
2011 Battlefield 3
45
63.2
2010 Civilization V
53
73.4
2009 League of Legends
113
156.8
2008 Crysis: Warhead
36
50.2

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
17
24.0
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
12
17.3
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
11
15.7
2023 The Last of Us Part I
9
12.4
2023 Forspoken
9
12.4
2023 The Callisto Protocol
7
10.6
2023 Dead Space
11
15.7
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
15
21.7
2023 Armored Core VI
15
21.7
2023 Immortals of Aveum
6
9.5
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
12
17.3
2023 Remnant II
7
9.9
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
10
14.5
2023 Atomic Heart
10
13.9
2023 Starfield
6
9.1
2022 Elden Ring
13
18.6
2022 God of War
13
19.0
2022 Overwatch 2
23
32.9
2022 F1 22
12
17.3
2022 Dying Light 2
12
17.3
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
13
18.6
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
21
29.1
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
14
20.0
2021 Forza Horizon 5
13
19.2
2021 Halo Infinite
11
15.9
2021 Battlefield 2042
15
20.8
2021 Hitman 3
17
24.5
2021 Far Cry 6
17
24.0
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
17
24.7
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
16
23.2
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
11
16.1
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
8
11.2
2020 Valorant
40
55.8
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
17
23.8
2020 Death Stranding
19
26.7
2020 Marvel's Avengers
12
16.9
2020 Godfall
16
22.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
12
17.3
2019 Apex Legends
21
30.0
2019 Anthem
15
21.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
29.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
22
30.7
2019 Metro Exodus
12
17.3
2019 World War Z
20
27.8
2019 Gears of War 5
16
22.5
2019 F1 2019
19
26.9
2019 GreedFall
18
24.9
2019 Borderlands 3
12
17.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
23
32.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
15.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
16
22.5
2018 Just Cause 4
16
22.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
16
23.0
2018 Strange Brigade
23
32.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
21
29.5
2017 For Honor
22
31.5
2017 Project CARS 2
20
27.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
29
40.6
2016 Dishonored 2
17
24.7
2015 Rocket League
44
61.3
2015 Need For Speed
24
33.6
2015 Project CARS
23
32.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
33
46.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
56
78.7
2009 League of Legends
68
95.2

Resolution 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
18
26.2
2019 Anthem
13
18.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
17
24.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
18
25.3
2019 Metro Exodus
10
15.1
2019 World War Z
17
24.0
2019 Gears of War 5
14
20.0
2019 F1 2019
17
24.0
2019 GreedFall
14
19.4
2019 Borderlands 3
10
14.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
20
28.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
13.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
14
20.0
2018 Just Cause 4
13
18.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
18.6
2018 Strange Brigade
20
27.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
19
27.1
2017 For Honor
18
26.0
2017 Project CARS 2
19
27.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
28
39.9
2016 Dishonored 2
17
23.8
2015 Rocket League
36
49.7
2015 Need For Speed
22
30.4
2015 Project CARS
21
29.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
27
38.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
57
79.7
2009 League of Legends
53
74.4

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
13
18.6
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
7
11.4
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
7
11.4
2023 The Last of Us Part I
4
6.9
2023 Forspoken
4
6.2
2023 The Callisto Protocol
3
5.6
2023 Dead Space
4
6.9
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
9
13.1
2023 Armored Core VI
9
13.1
2023 Immortals of Aveum
3
4.6
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
6
9.9
2023 Remnant II
3
5.3
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
5
7.6
2023 Atomic Heart
6
9.1
2023 Starfield
4
6.2
2022 Elden Ring
7
11.2
2022 God of War
10
15.3
2022 Overwatch 2
17
25.6
2022 F1 22
9
13.1
2022 Dying Light 2
9
13.1
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
10
14.5
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
14
21.3
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
9
13.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
10
15.5
2021 Halo Infinite
7
11.4
2021 Battlefield 2042
9
14.1
2021 Hitman 3
10
15.7
2021 Far Cry 6
9
13.9
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
10
14.5
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
10
15.7
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
7
11.4
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
6
9.1
2020 Valorant
34
49.6
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
9
13.5
2020 Death Stranding
12
17.3
2020 Marvel's Avengers
6
9.5
2020 Godfall
8
11.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
8
11.8
2019 Apex Legends
13
19.0
2019 Anthem
8
12.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
11
16.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
11
16.5
2019 Metro Exodus
7
11.4
2019 World War Z
11
17.1
2019 Gears of War 5
10
15.1
2019 F1 2019
12
18.0
2019 GreedFall
7
11.4
2019 Borderlands 3
6
9.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
14
20.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
7
10.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
10
15.1
2018 Just Cause 4
8
12.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
8
12.0
2018 Strange Brigade
13
19.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
21.3
2017 For Honor
12
17.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
23.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
24
34.7
2016 Dishonored 2
14
20.2
2015 Rocket League
22
31.6
2015 Need For Speed
16
23.6
2015 Project CARS
16
23.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
24.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
50
71.9
2009 League of Legends
30
43.2
GTX 650 Ti Boost with FX-8120 at 1080p and High Quality settings
GTX 650 Ti Boost with FX-8120 at 1440p and High Quality settings
GTX 650 Ti Boost with FX-8120 at 4K and High Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

GTX 650 Ti Boost Specifications

GTX 650 Ti Boost Board Design

Board NumberP2030
Length9.5 inches 241 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP134 W

GTX 650 Ti Boost Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1032 MHz
GPU Clock980 MHz
Memory Clock1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 600
Launch Price169 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 26th, 2013

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Features

CUDA3
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.82

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Processor

ArchitectureKepler
Die Size221 mm²
GPU NameGK106
GPU VariantGK106-240-A1
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,540 million

GTX 650 Ti Boost Memory

Bandwidth144.2 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 650 Ti Boost Render Config

ROPs24
SMX Count4
Shading Units768
TMUs64

GTX 650 Ti Boost Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,585 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance66.05 GFLOPS (1:24)
Pixel Rate16.51 GPixel/s
Texture Rate66.05 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments