|
27" AOpen 27MX1 |
27" ViewSonic XG2702 |
Difference |
| Brand |
AOpen |
ViewSonic |
|
| Year |
2018 |
2017 |
1 (0%) |
| Model |
27MX1 |
XG2702 |
|
| Size |
27" |
27" |
0 (0%) |
| Minimum Refresh Rate |
48Hz |
24Hz |
24 (50%) |
| Maximum Refresh Rate |
75Hz |
144Hz |
69 (92%) |
| AMD FreeSync |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| NVIDIA G-Sync |
No |
No |
|
| Maximum Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
1920 x 1080 |
|
| Panel Type |
TN |
TN |
|
| Pixel Density |
81 ppi |
81 ppi |
0 (0%) |
| Minimum Response Time |
1ms |
1ms |
0 (0%) |
| Average Response Time |
1.5ms |
4ms |
2.5 (167%) |
| Total Response + Input Lag |
12ms |
14.5ms |
2.5 (21%) |
| Maximum Brightness |
300 cd/m^2 |
400 cd/m^2 |
100 (33%) |
| Price |
$ 203.0 |
$ 275.0 |
72 (35%) |
| VESA Mount |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Native Color Depth |
6 bit |
6 bit |
0 (0%) |
| Static Contrast Ratio |
1000 : 1 |
1000 : 1 |
0 (0%) |
| Display Port |
No |
Yes |
|
| Overall Combination Score |
67.5/100 |
77.5/100 |
10 (15%) |
The AOpen 27MX1 is newer than ViewSonic XG2702 . The brightness of ViewSonic XG2702 is better than AOpen 27MX1 by 29 %. For the extremely fast frame rates, the ViewSonic XG2702 has better maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz that allows smoother gameplay. AOpen 27MX1 has lower total input lag than ViewSonic XG2702 . To compensate for graphically demanding games, the ViewSonic XG2702 has better low end adaptive refresh rate of 24 Hz that can adapt to more lower frame rate drops. For the average response rate, the AOpen 27MX1 scores 1.5 ms, which is faster than the ViewSonic XG2702 . The ViewSonic XG2702 has the Display Port and this is essential for NVIDIA cards to work with AMD FreeSync.
27" AOpen 27MX1
The AOpen 27MX1 is a relatively new monitor. For the average response rate, the AOpen 27MX1 scores 1.5 ms, which ensures effective synchronization with the high refresh rate. With the AMD FreeSync support, this monitor is compatible with both AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards. AOpen 27MX1 has a total input lag of 12 ms, which is excellent among the competition. The monitor has a VESA mount. The minimum response rate of AOpen 27MX1 is 1 ms, which is eliminates ghosting effects. The brightness of AOpen 27MX1 is lower than other monitors. The AOpen 27MX1 has no Display Port and which is essential for NVIDIA cards to work with AMD FreeSync. The monitor uses a TN panel which suffers from color shifting when viewed from horizontal and vertical angles and has slightly washed colors compared to IPS and VA panels. Graphically demanding games may cause frame drops outside the adative refresh rate of 48 Hz. The AOpen 27MX1 has a maximum refresh rate of 75 Hz and this may be too low for the extremely fast frame rates in competitive games. In terms of pixel density, the AOpen 27MX1 has an low density of 81 pixels-per-inch, resulting in pixelated text and picture quality. The monitor has an unimpressive contrast ratio of 1000 : 1. For graphics color quality, the AOpen 27MX1 has an average color depth of 6 -bit, resulting in dithered gradients and more slightly less accurate colors.
27" ViewSonic XG2702
The ViewSonic XG2702 has the Display Port and this is essential for NVIDIA cards to work with AMD FreeSync. The brightness of ViewSonic XG2702 is significantly better than other monitors. ViewSonic XG2702 has a total input lag of 14.5 ms, which is excellent among the competition. The minimum response rate of ViewSonic XG2702 is 1 ms, which is eliminates ghosting effects. The ViewSonic XG2702 is a relatively new monitor. To compensate for graphically demanding games, the ViewSonic XG2702 has a very good low end adaptive refresh rate of 24 Hz that can adapt to more lower frame rate drops. With the AMD FreeSync support, this monitor is compatible with both AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards. For the extremely fast frame rates, the ViewSonic XG2702 has a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz that allows smoother gameplay. The monitor has a VESA mount. For the average response rate, the ViewSonic XG2702 scores 4 ms, which ensures effective synchronization with the high refresh rate. The monitor uses a TN panel which suffers from color shifting when viewed from horizontal and vertical angles and has slightly washed colors compared to IPS and VA panels. In terms of pixel density, the ViewSonic XG2702 has an low density of 81 pixels-per-inch, resulting in pixelated text and picture quality. For graphics color quality, the ViewSonic XG2702 has an average color depth of 6 -bit, resulting in dithered gradients and more slightly less accurate colors. The monitor has an unimpressive contrast ratio of 1000 : 1.
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments