i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 - Valorant RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255

Multi-Thread Performance

17589 Pts
1848 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2834 Pts
1046 Pts

Valorant

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 in Valorant using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
253.0 FPS
1080p
98.1 FPS
1440p
206.7 FPS
1440p
80.2 FPS
2160p
189.2 FPS
2160p
73.4 FPS
w1440p
211.8 FPS
w1440p
82.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
339.9 FPS
1080p
155.0 FPS
1440p
288.2 FPS
1440p
130.8 FPS
2160p
268.0 FPS
2160p
121.3 FPS
w1440p
294.0 FPS
w1440p
133.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
426.9 FPS
1080p
212.0 FPS
1440p
369.6 FPS
1440p
181.4 FPS
2160p
346.7 FPS
2160p
169.3 FPS
w1440p
376.2 FPS
w1440p
184.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
600.7 FPS
1080p
325.9 FPS
1440p
532.6 FPS
1440p
282.6 FPS
2160p
504.2 FPS
2160p
265.1 FPS
w1440p
540.5 FPS
w1440p
287.3 FPS
i7-9700F
  • The i7-9700F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 255
  • The Athlon II X2 255 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 255 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Athlon II X2 255 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 specifications

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 Architecture

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255
CodenameCoffee LakeRegor
GenerationCore i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX255OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jan 2010

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 Cache

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 Cores

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255
# of Cores82
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 Performance

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier30.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.7 GHzN/A
Voltageunknown1.15 V

i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 Physical

i7-9700F Athlon II X2 255
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA14CµPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i7-9700F vs Athlon II X2 255 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments