i3-12100 vs i3-6300 - Valorant GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-6300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
5849 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2166 Pts

Valorant

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 in Valorant using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-6300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.9 FPS
1080p
47.0 FPS
1440p
63.0 FPS
1440p
38.5 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
33.4 FPS
w1440p
63.0 FPS
w1440p
38.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
126.2 FPS
1080p
82.9 FPS
1440p
106.5 FPS
1440p
69.8 FPS
2160p
94.4 FPS
2160p
61.8 FPS
w1440p
106.5 FPS
w1440p
69.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
175.5 FPS
1080p
118.9 FPS
1440p
150.1 FPS
1440p
101.2 FPS
2160p
134.2 FPS
2160p
90.2 FPS
w1440p
150.1 FPS
w1440p
101.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
274.2 FPS
1080p
190.7 FPS
1440p
237.2 FPS
1440p
163.9 FPS
2160p
213.7 FPS
2160p
146.9 FPS
w1440p
237.2 FPS
w1440p
163.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6300
  • The i3-6300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-6300
CodenameAlder Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR2HA
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-6300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-6300
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-6300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier33.0x38.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-6300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-6300
Die Size163 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments