Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

4177 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1262 Pts
2531 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
8.9 FPS
1080p
17.9 FPS
1440p
6.7 FPS
1440p
13.5 FPS
2160p
3.5 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
5.5 FPS
w1440p
11.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.4 FPS
1080p
35.9 FPS
1440p
15.1 FPS
1440p
28.0 FPS
2160p
8.4 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
23.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.9 FPS
1080p
53.9 FPS
1440p
23.5 FPS
1440p
42.6 FPS
2160p
13.4 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
36.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.9 FPS
1080p
89.9 FPS
1440p
40.2 FPS
1440p
71.6 FPS
2160p
23.3 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
61.1 FPS
Core2 Quad Q9650
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 specifications

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Architecture

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Cache

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Cores

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Features

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Performance

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100
    Frequency3 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP95 W65 W

    Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 Physical

    Core2 Quad Q9650 i3-10100

    Compare Core2 Quad Q9650 vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments
    A
    awokepogo 11 years ago
    i3 vs core2quad q9650 for Watch dogs :)I had a average budget but I wanna run that at low-medium settings (without lags).suggest me the better one BTW i3 vs core2quad ..
    0 0
    F
    FALSEfluid 11 years ago
    An i3 4130/4150 would be better than the Q9650. The Q9650 has to be well overclocked to get close to an old ivy i3.
    0 0
    S
    swooshjackberry 9 years ago
    Inter Core 2 Quad Q9650 Temp???!!!!!!Hello guys i upgraded from q9400 to q9650 so guys when i was on q9400 on the heavy load and gaming my temps didnt go over 55C but on my new q9650 idle cores are 40-50 and when gaming and load between 50-70 so is there a problem or just the q9650 make more heat ???
    0 0
    L
    luggmagnitude 9 years ago
    You nailed it, Q9650 produces more heat. Both CPUs are based on identical technology, just the frequency is higher on 9650. Hence the increased heat. 70C is not too much for Intel - at least not if it is not a constant temperature. I would just make sure that case has decent airflow and is clean. If that temp really bugs you, you can always get a better cooler.
    0 0
    P
    periodiccholly 9 years ago
    amd fx 4100 vs intel core quad q9650what is best amd fx 4100 or intel core quad q9650? iknow q9650 still is good for 720 p gaming what about fx 4100 is it weaker or stronger?
    0 0
    E
    effortcreamy 9 years ago
    Yes for 720p it would be more than enough for sure ( if combined with a decent GPU of course).
    0 0
    T
    trophybakery 9 years ago
    core 2 quad q9950 vs q9650Does core 2 quad q9950 exists. I searched every where (even in intel website) I can but I couldn't find any spec of q9950. Why it is not popular?Can I get significant performance from core 2 quad q9950 than q9650.
    0 0
    I
    inbreeding 9 years ago
    Core 2 Quads are dated, I myself am using a Q8400 overclocked machine, it served me well in the first era of the "new gen games", even holds up rather well on The Witcher 3, but it will bottleneck even a GTX 750 Ti on the upcoming games and current new games and even the performance on Windows, do all you can to get at least an i5 4th gen or even the new Skylake i3 6100, which is what I am aiming for right now, my GTX 950 simply cant run the new games due to the massive CPU limitation I have, even with the overclock. You will not get much improvement, you could get a lot of improvement if you OC your C2Q to 4.00 GHz and beyond, but that requires custom cooling, a very capable and expensive 775, hard to find and most of the time, used mobo and a powerful PSU, not worth the hassle imo, just get a newer gen CPU, any 4th gen i3 or i5 is better than all C2Qs out there and you can throw even a GTX 980 at them and there wont be any bottleneck or very, very small at some games. Dont forget to add 8GB of RAM too. Good luck.
    0 0
    M
    murreletrapunzel 10 years ago
    Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a Q965 chipsetIm planning on buying my friends last machine, An HP DC7700. I am wanting to upgrade the CPU from a Duo E4400 to the Q9560. Ive heard from some that it wont work on the chipset. Would it work. Im looking for the machine to do some work, instead of sitting around as a paper weight.
    0 0
    C
    casuallythinning 10 years ago
    No, that chipset doesn't support Core 2 Quad chips. Source: http://www.cpu-upgrade.com/mb-Intel_%28chipsets%29/Q965_Express.htmlWhere do you live? I have a board that supports quad core chips (it was previously running my Q8300) and I can mail it to you for free if you're in the UK. Otherwise boards go for as cheap as £25 on Ebay.Woody
    0 1