i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 - The Last of Us Part I R9 295X2 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
2986 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
1057 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 295X2 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.0 FPS
1080p
18.5 FPS
1440p
30.9 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
w1440p
25.2 FPS
w1440p
11.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.4 FPS
1080p
37.0 FPS
1440p
57.8 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
33.1 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
w1440p
48.4 FPS
w1440p
24.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.8 FPS
1080p
55.4 FPS
1440p
84.6 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
2160p
49.9 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
w1440p
71.6 FPS
w1440p
37.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
187.6 FPS
1080p
92.3 FPS
1440p
138.3 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
83.4 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
118.0 FPS
w1440p
62.9 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Quad Q8300
  • The Core2 Quad Q8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Core2 Quad Q8300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 specifications

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 Architecture

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300
CodenameRaptor Lake-SYorkfield
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SRMBHSLB5W
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 Cache

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)4MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 Cores

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300
# of Cores244
# of Threads324
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 Performance

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300
Base Clock100 MHz333 MHz
Frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier30.0x7.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzN/A

i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 Physical

i9-13900K Core2 Quad Q8300
Die Size257 mm²2x 82 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775
tCaseMax72°C71°C

Compare i9-13900K vs Core2 Quad Q8300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments