i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-9350KF

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
10458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2562 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-9350KF

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.4 FPS
1080p
17.7 FPS
1440p
15.5 FPS
1440p
13.4 FPS
2160p
8.2 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
12.6 FPS
w1440p
10.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.0 FPS
1080p
35.6 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
1440p
27.8 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.5 FPS
1080p
53.4 FPS
1440p
47.8 FPS
1440p
42.3 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.7 FPS
1080p
89.1 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
1440p
71.2 FPS
2160p
47.6 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
67.7 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-9350KF
  • The i3-9350KF has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF specifications

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF Architecture

i9-13900K i3-9350KF
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBHunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF Cache

i9-13900K i3-9350KF
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF Cores

i9-13900K i3-9350KF
# of Cores244
# of Threads324
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF Performance

i9-13900K i3-9350KF
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier30.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W91 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 4.6 GHz

i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF Physical

i9-13900K i3-9350KF
Die Size257 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-9350KF in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments