i9-13900K vs i3-10300 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2690 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-13900K vs i3-10300 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.0 FPS
1080p
23.0 FPS
1440p
19.6 FPS
1440p
17.5 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
2160p
9.2 FPS
w1440p
16.0 FPS
w1440p
14.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.4 FPS
1080p
44.7 FPS
1440p
38.9 FPS
1440p
35.2 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
w1440p
29.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.8 FPS
1080p
66.4 FPS
1440p
58.1 FPS
1440p
52.9 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.5 FPS
1080p
109.8 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
88.3 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
2160p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
82.2 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
i9-13900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-13900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-13900K i3-10300

    i9-13900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-13900K i3-10300

    i9-13900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-13900K i3-10300

    i9-13900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-13900K i3-10300
    Frequency3 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-13900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-13900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments