i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
1930 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
741 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
49.6 FPS
1080p
12.5 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
1440p
9.5 FPS
2160p
18.9 FPS
2160p
5.0 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
7.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.8 FPS
1080p
26.2 FPS
1440p
65.8 FPS
1440p
20.6 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
2160p
11.6 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
17.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.1 FPS
1080p
39.9 FPS
1440p
95.6 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
2160p
56.4 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
198.6 FPS
1080p
67.3 FPS
1440p
155.3 FPS
1440p
53.7 FPS
2160p
93.9 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom X3 8550
  • The Phenom X3 8550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom X3 8550 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 specifications

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 Architecture

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550
CodenameRaptor Lake-SToliman
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Phenom X3 (Toliman)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelunknown
Part#SRMBHHD8550WCJ3BGH
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 Cache

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)2MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 Cores

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550
# of Cores243
# of Threads323
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 Performance

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier30.0x11.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzN/A

i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 Physical

i9-13900K Phenom X3 8550
Die Size257 mm²285 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM2+
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-13900K vs Phenom X3 8550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments