i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
5344 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
1193 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.4 FPS
1080p
9.7 FPS
1440p
15.5 FPS
1440p
7.3 FPS
2160p
8.2 FPS
2160p
3.9 FPS
w1440p
12.6 FPS
w1440p
6.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.0 FPS
1080p
20.9 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
1440p
16.3 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.5 FPS
1080p
32.2 FPS
1440p
47.8 FPS
1440p
25.3 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
2160p
14.7 FPS
w1440p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.7 FPS
1080p
54.7 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
1440p
43.2 FPS
2160p
47.6 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
w1440p
67.7 FPS
w1440p
36.7 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1075T
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T specifications

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Architecture

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T
CodenameRaptor Lake-SThuban
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBHHDT75TFBK6DGRHDT75TFBGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cache

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cores

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T
# of Cores246
# of Threads326
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Performance

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier30.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 3.5 GHz

i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Physical

i9-13900K Phenom II X6 1075T
Die Size257 mm²346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-13900K vs Phenom II X6 1075T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments