i9-12900K vs i5-12400 - The Last of Us Part I R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
3240 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.2 FPS
1080p
27.0 FPS
1440p
18.7 FPS
1440p
18.4 FPS
2160p
9.8 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
w1440p
15.3 FPS
w1440p
15.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
53.4 FPS
1080p
51.4 FPS
1440p
37.3 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
2160p
21.1 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
30.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.5 FPS
1080p
75.8 FPS
1440p
55.9 FPS
1440p
55.2 FPS
2160p
32.5 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.8 FPS
1080p
124.5 FPS
1440p
93.1 FPS
1440p
91.9 FPS
2160p
55.1 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
w1440p
79.3 FPS
w1440p
78.0 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-12900K i5-12400
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-S
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateNov 4th, 2021Jan 4th, 2022

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-12900K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-12900K i5-12400
# of Cores166
# of Threads2412
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-12900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-12900K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments