i9-11900K vs i3-12100 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-11900K i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

23993 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3253 Pts
3340 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-11900K i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.4 FPS
1080p
43.5 FPS
1440p
35.3 FPS
1440p
33.0 FPS
2160p
18.5 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
26.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.5 FPS
1080p
77.6 FPS
1440p
64.8 FPS
1440p
61.1 FPS
2160p
37.0 FPS
2160p
34.8 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
w1440p
51.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
119.7 FPS
1080p
111.7 FPS
1440p
94.3 FPS
1440p
89.3 FPS
2160p
55.4 FPS
2160p
52.4 FPS
w1440p
79.9 FPS
w1440p
75.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
191.9 FPS
1080p
179.9 FPS
1440p
153.3 FPS
1440p
145.6 FPS
2160p
92.3 FPS
2160p
87.5 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
124.2 FPS
i9-11900K
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-11900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-11900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-11900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-11900K vs i3-12100 specifications

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Architecture

i9-11900K i3-12100
CodenameRocket LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Cache

i9-11900K i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Cores

i9-11900K i3-12100
# of Cores84
# of Threads168
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Features

i9-11900K i3-12100

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Notes

i9-11900K i3-12100

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Performance

i9-11900K i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i9-11900K vs i3-12100 Physical

i9-11900K i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-11900K vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
D
D 3 years ago
Where 11900?
0 0