i9-10900K vs i5-7400 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-7400

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
7352 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1952 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-7400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.5 FPS
1080p
37.0 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
1440p
28.1 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
w1440p
30.1 FPS
w1440p
22.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.2 FPS
1080p
67.5 FPS
1440p
67.2 FPS
1440p
53.2 FPS
2160p
38.5 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
44.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
121.9 FPS
1080p
98.0 FPS
1440p
97.6 FPS
1440p
78.3 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
82.8 FPS
w1440p
66.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
195.3 FPS
1080p
159.0 FPS
1440p
158.3 FPS
1440p
128.5 FPS
2160p
95.9 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
w1440p
135.5 FPS
w1440p
109.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-7400
  • The i5-7400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-7400 specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Architecture

i9-10900K i5-7400
CodenameComet LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR32W
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2017

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Cache

i9-10900K i5-7400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Cores

i9-10900K i5-7400
# of Cores104
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Features

i9-10900K i5-7400
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Notes

i9-10900K i5-7400

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Performance

i9-10900K i5-7400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 3.5 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i5-7400 Physical

i9-10900K i5-7400
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-7400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments