i9-10900K vs i5-4670 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-4670

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
7435 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2154 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-4670

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.5 FPS
1080p
38.0 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
1440p
28.9 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
w1440p
30.1 FPS
w1440p
23.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.2 FPS
1080p
69.1 FPS
1440p
67.2 FPS
1440p
54.5 FPS
2160p
38.5 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
45.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
121.9 FPS
1080p
100.1 FPS
1440p
97.6 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
w1440p
82.8 FPS
w1440p
67.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
195.3 FPS
1080p
162.3 FPS
1440p
158.3 FPS
1440p
131.3 FPS
2160p
95.9 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
w1440p
135.5 FPS
w1440p
112.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-4670
  • The i5-4670 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-4670 specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Architecture

i9-10900K i5-4670
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR14D
Production StatusActiveunknown
ReleasedMay 2020Jun 2013

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Cache

i9-10900K i5-4670
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Cores

i9-10900K i5-4670
# of Cores104
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Features

i9-10900K i5-4670
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Notes

i9-10900K i5-4670

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Performance

i9-10900K i5-4670
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W84 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 3.8 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i5-4670 Physical

i9-10900K i5-4670
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-4670 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments