i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G - The Last of Us Part I R9 280X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9273 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1926 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in The Last of Us Part I using R9 280X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.3 FPS
1080p
16.0 FPS
1440p
13.8 FPS
1440p
12.2 FPS
2160p
7.3 FPS
2160p
6.4 FPS
w1440p
11.3 FPS
w1440p
9.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.1 FPS
1080p
32.5 FPS
1440p
28.6 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
2160p
14.5 FPS
w1440p
24.0 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.9 FPS
1080p
49.1 FPS
1440p
43.4 FPS
1440p
39.1 FPS
2160p
25.3 FPS
2160p
22.6 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.4 FPS
1080p
82.2 FPS
1440p
72.9 FPS
1440p
66.0 FPS
2160p
43.2 FPS
2160p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
62.0 FPS
w1440p
55.6 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 2400G
  • The Ryzen 5 2400G has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 2400G is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G specifications

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Architecture

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
CodenameComet LakeRaven Ridge
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownYD2400C5M4MFB
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Feb 2018

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Cache

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Cores

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
# of Cores104
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Radeon RX Vega 11
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Features

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Notes

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Performance

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 3.9 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Physical

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Die Sizeunknown210 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA1200µOPGA-1331
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4950 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments