i7-13700K vs i5-12400 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-13700K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

28603 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4521 Pts
3240 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-13700K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
67.2 FPS
1080p
61.8 FPS
1440p
48.9 FPS
1440p
46.9 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
2160p
24.8 FPS
w1440p
40.0 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.6 FPS
1080p
104.8 FPS
1440p
85.8 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
2160p
49.4 FPS
2160p
47.7 FPS
w1440p
72.2 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
157.9 FPS
1080p
147.8 FPS
1440p
122.7 FPS
1440p
118.7 FPS
2160p
73.0 FPS
2160p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
104.4 FPS
w1440p
100.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
248.6 FPS
1080p
233.8 FPS
1440p
196.5 FPS
1440p
190.4 FPS
2160p
120.2 FPS
2160p
116.5 FPS
w1440p
168.8 FPS
w1440p
163.2 FPS
i7-13700K
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-13700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-13700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i7-13700K vs i5-12400 specifications

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i7-13700K i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i7 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$409$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMB8SRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 Cache

i7-13700K i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 Cores

i7-13700K i5-12400
# of Cores166
# of Threads2412
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 Performance

i7-13700K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier34.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1253 W65W
PL2253 W117W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i7-13700K vs i5-12400 Physical

i7-13700K i5-12400
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i7-13700K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments