i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-9600KF i5-11600K

Multi-Thread Performance

13507 Pts
14700 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2735 Pts
2992 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9600KF i5-11600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.9 FPS
1080p
24.8 FPS
1440p
18.2 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
14.9 FPS
w1440p
15.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.2 FPS
1080p
47.7 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
30.6 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.5 FPS
1080p
70.6 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
46.2 FPS
w1440p
47.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.1 FPS
1080p
116.5 FPS
1440p
91.1 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
77.6 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
i5-9600KF
  • The i5-9600KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9600KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K specifications

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K Architecture

i5-9600KF i5-11600K
CodenameCoffee LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#BX80684I59600KFBXC80684I5960KFSRFADunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJan 2019Mar 16th, 2021

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K Cache

i5-9600KF i5-11600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L39MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K Cores

i5-9600KF i5-11600K
# of Cores66
# of Threads612
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K Performance

i5-9600KF i5-11600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP95 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 4.9 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K Physical

i5-9600KF i5-11600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-9600KF vs i5-11600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments