i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
1743 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1005 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.7 FPS
1080p
18.3 FPS
1440p
37.8 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
2160p
19.9 FPS
2160p
7.3 FPS
w1440p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
90.0 FPS
1080p
36.6 FPS
1440p
68.8 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
39.4 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
w1440p
57.8 FPS
w1440p
24.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.3 FPS
1080p
54.9 FPS
1440p
99.7 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
25.3 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
36.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
204.9 FPS
1080p
91.5 FPS
1440p
161.6 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
2160p
97.8 FPS
2160p
43.2 FPS
w1440p
138.3 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 250
  • The Athlon II X2 250 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 specifications

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 Architecture

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDADX250OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 Cache

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250
Cache L180K (per core)256K
Cache L22MB (per core)2MB

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 Cores

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250
# of Cores142
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 Performance

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 Physical

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 250
Die Size257 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 250 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments