i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 - The Last of Us Part I GTX 950 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
1634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
933 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 950 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
12.6 FPS
1080p
4.6 FPS
1440p
8.7 FPS
1440p
3.5 FPS
2160p
4.6 FPS
2160p
1.8 FPS
w1440p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
2.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
26.4 FPS
1080p
10.8 FPS
1440p
19.0 FPS
1440p
8.4 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
2160p
4.6 FPS
w1440p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
6.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.2 FPS
1080p
17.0 FPS
1440p
29.3 FPS
1440p
13.4 FPS
2160p
17.0 FPS
2160p
7.5 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
11.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
67.7 FPS
1080p
29.4 FPS
1440p
50.0 FPS
1440p
23.3 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
2160p
13.2 FPS
w1440p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
19.3 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 220
  • The Athlon II X2 220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 220 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 specifications

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 Architecture

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDADX220OCK22GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 Cache

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L22MB (per core)512K

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 Cores

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220
# of Cores142
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier35.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 Physical

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 220
Die Size257 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments