i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
12265 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
1821 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
18.4 FPS
1080p
13.8 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
10.5 FPS
2160p
7.3 FPS
2160p
5.5 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
w1440p
8.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
36.8 FPS
1080p
28.6 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
22.5 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
24.2 FPS
w1440p
18.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
55.2 FPS
1080p
43.4 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
34.4 FPS
2160p
25.3 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
36.9 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
91.9 FPS
1080p
72.9 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
58.3 FPS
2160p
43.2 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
w1440p
49.0 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 1600
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 specifications

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Architecture

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600
CodenameAlder Lake-SZen
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YYD1600BBM6IAEYD1600BBAEBOX
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cache

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600
Cache L180K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Cores

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600
# of Cores66
# of Threads1212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Performance

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.6 GHz

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 Physical

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 1600
Die Size163 mm²192 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments