i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
7434 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
1854 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.5 FPS
1080p
14.3 FPS
1440p
14.8 FPS
1440p
10.8 FPS
2160p
7.8 FPS
2160p
5.7 FPS
w1440p
12.1 FPS
w1440p
8.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.7 FPS
1080p
29.5 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
1440p
23.0 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
2160p
13.1 FPS
w1440p
25.5 FPS
w1440p
19.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
44.7 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
1440p
35.3 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
38.8 FPS
w1440p
29.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.3 FPS
1080p
75.0 FPS
1440p
77.2 FPS
1440p
59.7 FPS
2160p
45.7 FPS
2160p
35.2 FPS
w1440p
65.5 FPS
w1440p
50.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 3 2200G
  • The Ryzen 3 2200G has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 3 2200G has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G specifications

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G Architecture

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaven Ridge
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 3 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YYD2200C5M4MFB
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G Cache

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G Cores

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Radeon Vega 8
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G Performance

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier25.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.7 GHz

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G Physical

i5-12400 Ryzen 3 2200G
Die Size163 mm²210 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AµOPGA-1331
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 3 2200G in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments