i5-11600K vs i3-4130 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i3-4130

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
4795 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
1961 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i3-4130

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.9 FPS
1080p
16.2 FPS
1440p
24.2 FPS
1440p
12.3 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
2160p
6.5 FPS
w1440p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
10.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.4 FPS
1080p
32.9 FPS
1440p
46.7 FPS
1440p
25.8 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
14.7 FPS
w1440p
39.2 FPS
w1440p
21.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.9 FPS
1080p
49.6 FPS
1440p
69.2 FPS
1440p
39.3 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
2160p
22.9 FPS
w1440p
58.6 FPS
w1440p
33.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.8 FPS
1080p
83.0 FPS
1440p
114.3 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
w1440p
97.5 FPS
w1440p
56.1 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4130
  • The i3-4130 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-4130 specifications

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Architecture

i5-11600K i3-4130
CodenameRocket LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR1NP
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Sep 2013

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Cache

i5-11600K i3-4130
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Cores

i5-11600K i3-4130
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750Intel HD 4400
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Features

i5-11600K i3-4130
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Notes

i5-11600K i3-4130

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Performance

i5-11600K i3-4130
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier39.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-11600K vs i3-4130 Physical

i5-11600K i3-4130
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-4130 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments