i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
1554 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
907 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.1 FPS
1080p
8.3 FPS
1440p
18.3 FPS
1440p
6.3 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
2160p
3.3 FPS
w1440p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
5.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.5 FPS
1080p
18.2 FPS
1440p
36.6 FPS
1440p
14.3 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
2160p
8.0 FPS
w1440p
30.7 FPS
w1440p
12.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.0 FPS
1080p
28.2 FPS
1440p
54.9 FPS
1440p
22.3 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
w1440p
18.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.9 FPS
1080p
48.1 FPS
1440p
91.5 FPS
1440p
38.2 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
22.2 FPS
w1440p
78.0 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E6600
  • The Core2 Duo E6600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 specifications

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Architecture

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
CodenameComet LakeConroe
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core 2 Duo (Conroe)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownSL9S8
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2006

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Cache

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
Cache L164K (per core)64K
Cache L2256K (per core)4MB

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Cores

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Features

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 EIST Intel 64 iAMT2 VT

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Notes

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Performance

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier29.0x9.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.34 V

i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 Physical

i5-10400 Core2 Duo E6600
Die Sizeunknown143 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA6
Process Size14 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 775
Transistorsunknown291 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs Core2 Duo E6600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments