i5-10400 vs i7-9700 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i7-9700

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
16302 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2722 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i7-9700

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.2 FPS
1080p
78.8 FPS
1440p
59.4 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
48.5 FPS
w1440p
48.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.0 FPS
1080p
128.9 FPS
1440p
101.3 FPS
1440p
102.1 FPS
2160p
58.4 FPS
2160p
58.7 FPS
w1440p
85.2 FPS
w1440p
85.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.8 FPS
1080p
178.9 FPS
1440p
143.3 FPS
1440p
144.2 FPS
2160p
85.5 FPS
2160p
86.0 FPS
w1440p
121.9 FPS
w1440p
122.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
277.5 FPS
1080p
279.0 FPS
1440p
227.1 FPS
1440p
228.5 FPS
2160p
139.7 FPS
2160p
140.4 FPS
w1440p
195.3 FPS
w1440p
196.5 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i7-9700
  • The i7-9700 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-9700 specifications

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Architecture

i5-10400 i7-9700
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Apr 2019

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Cache

i5-10400 i7-9700
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Cores

i5-10400 i7-9700
# of Cores68
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Features

i5-10400 i7-9700

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Notes

i5-10400 i7-9700

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Performance

i5-10400 i7-9700
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier29.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.7 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i7-9700 Physical

i5-10400 i7-9700
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA14C
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-9700 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments