i5-10400 vs i7-4770 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i7-4770

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
9786 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2227 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i7-4770

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.1 FPS
1080p
20.6 FPS
1440p
18.3 FPS
1440p
15.7 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
2160p
8.2 FPS
w1440p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
12.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.5 FPS
1080p
40.6 FPS
1440p
36.6 FPS
1440p
32.0 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
w1440p
30.7 FPS
w1440p
26.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.0 FPS
1080p
60.6 FPS
1440p
54.9 FPS
1440p
48.3 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
w1440p
40.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.9 FPS
1080p
100.6 FPS
1440p
91.5 FPS
1440p
80.9 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
47.6 FPS
w1440p
78.0 FPS
w1440p
68.6 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-4770
  • The i7-4770 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-4770 specifications

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Architecture

i5-10400 i7-4770
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR149
Production StatusActiveunknown
ReleasedMay 2020Jun 2013

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Cache

i5-10400 i7-4770
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Cores

i5-10400 i7-4770
# of Cores64
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Features

i5-10400 i7-4770
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 vPro Boost 2.0

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Notes

i5-10400 i7-4770

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Performance

i5-10400 i7-4770
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier29.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W84 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 3.9 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i7-4770 Physical

i5-10400 i7-4770
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-4770 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments