i5-10400 vs i3-9100 - The Last of Us Part I RX 6700 XT - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-9100

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
9095 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2411 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 in The Last of Us Part I using RX 6700 XT - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-9100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.3 FPS
1080p
52.4 FPS
1440p
43.5 FPS
1440p
39.9 FPS
2160p
22.9 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
w1440p
32.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.3 FPS
1080p
91.0 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
2160p
44.5 FPS
2160p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
65.1 FPS
w1440p
60.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.2 FPS
1080p
129.7 FPS
1440p
111.7 FPS
1440p
104.2 FPS
2160p
66.1 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
94.8 FPS
w1440p
88.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.1 FPS
1080p
206.9 FPS
1440p
179.9 FPS
1440p
168.4 FPS
2160p
109.4 FPS
2160p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
154.0 FPS
w1440p
144.2 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-9100 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-9100
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR3XQ
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2018

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Cache

i5-10400 i3-9100
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Cores

i5-10400 i3-9100
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Features

i5-10400 i3-9100

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Notes

i5-10400 i3-9100

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Performance

i5-10400 i3-9100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier29.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10400 vs i3-9100 Physical

i5-10400 i3-9100
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-9100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments