i5-10400 vs i3-540 - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-540

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
2687 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
1224 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i3-540 in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-540

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
18.0 FPS
1080p
5.1 FPS
1440p
13.6 FPS
1440p
3.8 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
2160p
2.0 FPS
w1440p
11.1 FPS
w1440p
3.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
36.1 FPS
1080p
11.8 FPS
1440p
28.2 FPS
1440p
9.1 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
2160p
5.1 FPS
w1440p
23.6 FPS
w1440p
7.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.2 FPS
1080p
18.6 FPS
1440p
42.8 FPS
1440p
14.4 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
2160p
8.2 FPS
w1440p
36.1 FPS
w1440p
12.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
90.3 FPS
1080p
32.0 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
1440p
25.0 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
2160p
14.4 FPS
w1440p
61.1 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-540
  • The i3-540 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-540 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-540
CodenameComet LakeClarkdale
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSLBX7SLBLR
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Cache

i5-10400 i3-540
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Cores

i5-10400 i3-540
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Features

i5-10400 i3-540
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 Intel 64 HTT VT-x XD-Bit

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Notes

i5-10400 i3-540

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Performance

i5-10400 i3-540
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.066 GHz
Multiplier29.0x23.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Physical

i5-10400 i3-540
Die Sizeunknown81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1156
Transistorsunknown382 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-540 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments