i5-10400 vs i3-4130 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-4130

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
4795 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
1961 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-4130

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.2 FPS
1080p
40.7 FPS
1440p
59.4 FPS
1440p
30.9 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
w1440p
48.5 FPS
w1440p
25.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.0 FPS
1080p
73.3 FPS
1440p
101.3 FPS
1440p
57.8 FPS
2160p
58.4 FPS
2160p
33.1 FPS
w1440p
85.2 FPS
w1440p
48.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.8 FPS
1080p
105.9 FPS
1440p
143.3 FPS
1440p
84.6 FPS
2160p
85.5 FPS
2160p
49.9 FPS
w1440p
121.9 FPS
w1440p
71.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
277.5 FPS
1080p
171.0 FPS
1440p
227.1 FPS
1440p
138.3 FPS
2160p
139.7 FPS
2160p
83.4 FPS
w1440p
195.3 FPS
w1440p
118.3 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4130
  • The i3-4130 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-4130 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-4130
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR1NP
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2013

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Cache

i5-10400 i3-4130
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Cores

i5-10400 i3-4130
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD 4400
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Features

i5-10400 i3-4130
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Notes

i5-10400 i3-4130

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Performance

i5-10400 i3-4130
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier29.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i3-4130 Physical

i5-10400 i3-4130
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-4130 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments