i5-10400 vs i3-2105 - The Last of Us Part I RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-2105

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
3704 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
1574 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 in The Last of Us Part I using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-2105

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
35.7 FPS
1080p
14.5 FPS
1440p
27.1 FPS
1440p
11.0 FPS
2160p
14.3 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
w1440p
22.2 FPS
w1440p
9.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
65.4 FPS
1080p
29.8 FPS
1440p
51.5 FPS
1440p
23.4 FPS
2160p
29.5 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
w1440p
43.3 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.2 FPS
1080p
45.2 FPS
1440p
76.0 FPS
1440p
35.8 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
w1440p
64.5 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
154.7 FPS
1080p
75.9 FPS
1440p
124.9 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
2160p
75.0 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
w1440p
106.7 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-2105
  • The i3-2105 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-2105 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-2105
CodenameComet LakeSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR0BA
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020May 2011

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Cache

i5-10400 i3-2105
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Cores

i5-10400 i3-2105
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD 3000
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Features

i5-10400 i3-2105
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4.2 Intel 64 SMT EIST HTT XD-Bit VT-x TXT

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Notes

i5-10400 i3-2105

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Performance

i5-10400 i3-2105
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier29.0x31.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i3-2105 Physical

i5-10400 i3-2105
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1155
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-2105 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments