i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
2227 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
844 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.6 FPS
1080p
5.9 FPS
1440p
12.6 FPS
1440p
4.5 FPS
2160p
6.6 FPS
2160p
2.4 FPS
w1440p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
3.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.6 FPS
1080p
13.5 FPS
1440p
26.4 FPS
1440p
10.6 FPS
2160p
14.9 FPS
2160p
6.0 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
8.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.6 FPS
1080p
21.0 FPS
1440p
40.2 FPS
1440p
16.7 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
w1440p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
14.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
84.6 FPS
1080p
36.2 FPS
1440p
67.7 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
24.4 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • The i3-9350KF has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-9350KF has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9350KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X3 705e is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e specifications

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e Architecture

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e
CodenameCoffee LakeHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jun 2009

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e Cache

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e Cores

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier40.0x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP91 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.25 V

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e Physical

i3-9350KF Phenom II X3 705e
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X3 705e in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments