i3-9320 vs i3-10300 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2690 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
22.3 FPS
1080p
23.0 FPS
1440p
16.9 FPS
1440p
17.5 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
2160p
9.2 FPS
w1440p
13.8 FPS
w1440p
14.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
43.5 FPS
1080p
44.7 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
1440p
35.2 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
28.6 FPS
w1440p
29.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
64.7 FPS
1080p
66.4 FPS
1440p
51.4 FPS
1440p
52.9 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
107.1 FPS
1080p
109.8 FPS
1440p
85.9 FPS
1440p
88.3 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
2160p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
72.9 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10300

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10300

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10300

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10300
Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10300

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments