i3-7320 vs i3-10100 - The Last of Us Part I Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2531 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in The Last of Us Part I using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.1 FPS
1080p
22.6 FPS
1440p
14.5 FPS
1440p
17.1 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
2160p
9.0 FPS
w1440p
11.8 FPS
w1440p
14.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.0 FPS
1080p
44.0 FPS
1440p
29.8 FPS
1440p
34.5 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
2160p
19.6 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
w1440p
28.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.9 FPS
1080p
65.4 FPS
1440p
45.2 FPS
1440p
51.9 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
2160p
30.2 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
w1440p
43.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.7 FPS
1080p
108.2 FPS
1440p
75.9 FPS
1440p
86.7 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
51.4 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
73.8 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 specifications

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cache

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cores

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Features

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Performance

    i3-7320 i3-10100
    Frequency4.1 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP51 W65 W

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Physical

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments