i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 - The Last of Us Part I TITAN Xp - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
2857 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1169 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 in The Last of Us Part I using TITAN Xp - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.6 FPS
1080p
24.8 FPS
1440p
30.1 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
2160p
15.8 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
24.6 FPS
w1440p
15.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.6 FPS
1080p
47.7 FPS
1440p
56.5 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
47.4 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.5 FPS
1080p
70.6 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
2160p
48.6 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
47.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
167.5 FPS
1080p
116.5 FPS
1440p
135.5 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
2160p
81.3 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
115.7 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-7320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 460
  • The Athlon II X3 460 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X3 460 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.

Compare i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 specifications

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Architecture

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
CodenameKaby LakeRana
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#SR358ADX460WFK32GMADX460WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2017May 2011

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Cache

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Cores

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
# of Cores23
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Features

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Performance

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier41.0x17.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.4 V

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 Physical

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 460
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax65°Cunknown

Compare i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 460 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments