i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 - The Last of Us Part I RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
2571 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1015 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 in The Last of Us Part I using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.8 FPS
1080p
31.8 FPS
1440p
46.9 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
19.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.8 FPS
1080p
59.2 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
2160p
47.6 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
w1440p
39.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
147.8 FPS
1080p
86.6 FPS
1440p
118.7 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
2160p
70.4 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
100.8 FPS
w1440p
58.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
233.8 FPS
1080p
141.5 FPS
1440p
190.4 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
2160p
116.1 FPS
2160p
68.2 FPS
w1440p
163.2 FPS
w1440p
97.1 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-7320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 440
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.

Compare i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 specifications

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Architecture

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
CodenameKaby LakeRana
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#SR358ADX440WFK32GIADX440WFGIBOXADX440WFK32GMADX440WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2017Jan 2010

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Cache

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Cores

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
# of Cores23
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Features

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.425 V

i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 Physical

i3-7320 Athlon II X3 440
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax65°Cunknown

Compare i3-7320 vs Athlon II X3 440 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments