i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - The Last of Us Part I R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
29.5 FPS
1440p
22.4 FPS
1440p
22.2 FPS
2160p
11.8 FPS
2160p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
18.3 FPS
w1440p
18.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
55.5 FPS
1440p
43.7 FPS
1440p
43.3 FPS
2160p
24.9 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
36.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
81.5 FPS
1440p
64.9 FPS
1440p
64.5 FPS
2160p
38.0 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
54.9 FPS
w1440p
54.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
133.4 FPS
1440p
107.5 FPS
1440p
106.7 FPS
2160p
64.2 FPS
2160p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
90.7 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments