i3-12100 vs i3-10100 - The Last of Us Part I R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2531 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.4 FPS
1080p
26.2 FPS
1440p
20.3 FPS
1440p
19.9 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
2160p
10.5 FPS
w1440p
16.6 FPS
w1440p
16.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.0 FPS
1080p
50.1 FPS
1440p
40.1 FPS
1440p
39.4 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
2160p
22.5 FPS
w1440p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
33.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.7 FPS
1080p
73.9 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
1440p
58.9 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
2160p
34.4 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
126.0 FPS
1080p
121.6 FPS
1440p
99.4 FPS
1440p
97.8 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
2160p
58.3 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
83.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10100

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10100

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10100

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10100
Frequency3.3 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10100

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments