i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
14358 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2138 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.8 FPS
1080p
15.3 FPS
1440p
12.7 FPS
1440p
11.6 FPS
2160p
6.7 FPS
2160p
6.1 FPS
w1440p
10.4 FPS
w1440p
9.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.0 FPS
1080p
31.3 FPS
1440p
26.6 FPS
1440p
24.5 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
2160p
13.9 FPS
w1440p
22.3 FPS
w1440p
20.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.1 FPS
1080p
47.3 FPS
1440p
40.4 FPS
1440p
37.4 FPS
2160p
23.5 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
31.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.5 FPS
1080p
79.3 FPS
1440p
68.2 FPS
1440p
63.3 FPS
2160p
40.2 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
w1440p
57.9 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen 5 2600X

    Compare i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X specifications

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Compatibility

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X General

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Integrated Graphics

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Memory Specs

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Performance

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X
    Frequency3.60 GHz3.6 GHz
    TDP65 W95 W

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Technical Specs

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Technologies and Extensions

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X Virtualization Technologies

    i3-10100 Ryzen 5 2600X

    Compare i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 2600X in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments