Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

1931 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1031 Pts
4683 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
9.7 FPS
1080p
26.6 FPS
1440p
7.4 FPS
1440p
18.9 FPS
2160p
3.9 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
6.0 FPS
w1440p
15.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.9 FPS
1080p
50.7 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
74.8 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
56.4 FPS
2160p
14.7 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
47.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.7 FPS
1080p
123.1 FPS
1440p
43.7 FPS
1440p
93.9 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
36.7 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
Phenom II X2 B55
  • The Phenom II X2 B55 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X2 B55 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K specifications

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Architecture

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K
CodenameCallistoRaptor Lake-S
GenerationPhenom II X2 (Callisto)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#HDXB55WFK2DGMSRMBH
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Cache

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K
Cache L1128K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)36MB (shared)

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Cores

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K
# of Cores224
# of Threads232
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Features

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Notes

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Performance

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K
Base Clock200 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier15.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP80 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.8 GHz

Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K Physical

Phenom II X2 B55 i9-13900K
Die Size258 mm²257 mm²
PackageµPGAFC-LGA16A
Process Size45 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM3Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Phenom II X2 B55 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments