i9-12900K vs i9-13900K - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
4683 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.8 FPS
1080p
17.4 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
1440p
11.9 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
2160p
5.9 FPS
w1440p
9.4 FPS
w1440p
9.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.0 FPS
1080p
35.0 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
1440p
25.1 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
2160p
13.5 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
20.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.1 FPS
1080p
52.6 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
1440p
38.3 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
31.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.5 FPS
1080p
87.9 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
1440p
64.6 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
2160p
36.2 FPS
w1440p
53.3 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i9-12900K vs i9-13900K specifications

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K Architecture

i9-12900K i9-13900K
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-S
ECC MemoryNoYes
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateNov 4th, 2021Sep 27th, 2022

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K Cache

i9-12900K i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)2MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K Cores

i9-12900K i9-13900K
# of Cores1624
# of Threads2432
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K Performance

i9-12900K i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier32.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i9-12900K vs i9-13900K Physical

i9-12900K i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments