i9-12900K vs i5-11400 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i5-11400

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
2700 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i5-11400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.8 FPS
1080p
15.8 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
1440p
11.3 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
w1440p
9.4 FPS
w1440p
9.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.0 FPS
1080p
32.2 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
1440p
24.0 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.1 FPS
1080p
48.6 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
1440p
36.6 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
2160p
20.1 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.5 FPS
1080p
81.3 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
1440p
62.0 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
2160p
34.6 FPS
w1440p
53.3 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-11400
  • The i5-11400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-11400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-11400 specifications

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 Architecture

i9-12900K i5-11400
CodenameAlder LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 Cache

i9-12900K i5-11400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)256K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 Cores

i9-12900K i5-11400
# of Cores166
# of Threads2412
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 Performance

i9-12900K i5-11400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier32.0x26.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-12900K vs i5-11400 Physical

i9-12900K i5-11400
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-11400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments