i5-13600K vs i3-3220 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i3-3220

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
4235 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1758 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i3-3220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
55.4 FPS
1080p
23.3 FPS
1440p
37.9 FPS
1440p
16.6 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
8.3 FPS
w1440p
30.4 FPS
w1440p
13.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.5 FPS
1080p
45.2 FPS
1440p
68.9 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
w1440p
27.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.5 FPS
1080p
67.1 FPS
1440p
99.9 FPS
1440p
50.6 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
28.2 FPS
w1440p
83.5 FPS
w1440p
42.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
215.7 FPS
1080p
110.9 FPS
1440p
161.9 FPS
1440p
84.6 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
w1440p
136.6 FPS
w1440p
70.8 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-3220
  • The i3-3220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-3220 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-3220 specifications

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 Architecture

i5-13600K i3-3220
CodenameRaptor Lake-SIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Ivy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDSR0RG
Production StatusActiveunknown

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 Cache

i5-13600K i3-3220
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 Cores

i5-13600K i3-3220
# of Cores142
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770Intel HD 2500
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 Performance

i5-13600K i3-3220
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W55 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs i3-3220 Physical

i5-13600K i3-3220
Die Size257 mm²94 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-3220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments