i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
1873 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1074 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.2 FPS
1080p
21.4 FPS
1440p
39.8 FPS
1440p
15.2 FPS
2160p
19.9 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
32.0 FPS
w1440p
12.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.6 FPS
1080p
42.0 FPS
1440p
71.9 FPS
1440p
31.1 FPS
2160p
39.4 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
59.5 FPS
w1440p
25.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.0 FPS
1080p
62.5 FPS
1440p
104.0 FPS
1440p
47.0 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
87.1 FPS
w1440p
39.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
223.7 FPS
1080p
103.7 FPS
1440p
168.1 FPS
1440p
78.8 FPS
2160p
97.8 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
142.1 FPS
w1440p
66.0 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 260
  • The Athlon II X2 260 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 specifications

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 Architecture

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDADX260OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 Cache

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260
Cache L180K (per core)128K
Cache L22MB (per core)1MB

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 Cores

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260
# of Cores142
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 Performance

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier35.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 Physical

i5-13600K Athlon II X2 260
Die Size257 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Athlon II X2 260 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments